Thursday, April 16, 2009

How Can I Tighten My Pusi

The construction industry, what went wrong?

Looking for a few of the many responsibilities, too many crashes have occurred with the earthquake of April 6 last year, we to reconstruct the building industry, as has been suggested in several statements in recent days, the manufacturers, it consists essentially of three phases: planning, implementation and monitoring.
Now you begin to demand recognition and certification of construction firms for reconstruction. But it is disheartening, and we believe the method of least significant building in the city, see the buildings whose construction was completed a few weeks with even the banners claiming that the sale is completely gutted, with entire walls come down, at best, by break down even more because it is not expedient to meddle in the worst cases.
The world of manufacturers advocates: the fault of the controls, they say. Too little incisive and far between.
Who builds it is not the designer, if poorly designed that should see its proposal rejected by the relevant bodies such as the City, who must monitor, in Italy know that often does not do his job, perhaps with the complicity of rules completely ineffective; those who build, should do so in a workmanlike manner, according to the rules of common sense, safety, functionality, even if in the knowledge that nobody controls, and even if it means going beyond the standards, if these were inadequate.
"We must take account of the history of the companies involved for years in the industry," says Paolo Buzzetti, National President of the hip. Perhaps unconscious of the fact that a large portion of the Eagle, not all thank God, they pulled up their builders' notes and certificates, requirements that now he asks the firms for the reconstruction. And perhaps in incosapevolezza that all those giants with feet of clay came down like any building made by individuals on their own, were made by companies that own Buzzetti called "notes" and "with a story behind it."
But yesterday there was probably unconscious again, even an indictment against colleagues from L'Aquila, Buzzetti by visiting L'Aquila for the ANC president, "the rules of seismic building dating back to 1974 and 1996 are more than enough, a building constructed on the basis of the rules of the 1974 earthquake does not go down." We are in 2009, the rules mentioned by Buzzetti date back between 35 and 13 years ago, you see buildings that have suffered serious damage, or even to understand the era of achievement and make two and two together.
And he, like his counterpart local Cicchetti, comes back to beat the sore tooth of the rules do not apply, on the other hand we know, in Italy, if not suppress enough, no one respects anything. The building, from this point of view, are clearly emblematic italianity gear. It
meanwhile, are stepping forward several hypotheses on the methodology for the reconstruction. The Aquila bother to stay in temporary accommodation for the next twenty years as all the people who suffered the disaster of an earthquake in Italy. So while politicians and "technicians" are divided between new towns and reconstruction of existing, if you really want to give a concrete answer to all those who were left without a home, and leave the door mafia, various business and speculation, is assigned to each the family must think for myself so that I can pull up to a new home, maybe - experience showed us that - would be even safer buildings by building speculators ready-made set to double their profits.

0 comments:

Post a Comment